Handwriting Efficiency Lab · Episode 02

Uppercase Handwriting Speed Test: Comparing Join and Stroke Structure

A controlled uppercase pangram experiment that measures how two writing models handle larger letterforms, stroke transitions, and pen-up travel.

Published June 3, 2026Updated August 21, 2026Approx. 7 min read

Original research video

Uppercase pangram speed comparison

This is not an AI-generated handwriting video. We extracted real stroke-order paths from the tested writing models and rendered their measured trajectories as a deterministic canvas animation.

35 uppercase letters9 wordsFAST setting

Test phrase

35 letters

THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG

Pen speed

86.5 px/s

FAST setting for uppercase samples

Pen-up speed

2.5×

Configured faster than pen-tip writing speed

Models tested

2

Getty Dubay Joined Beginning + Playwrite CA

The research question

How does uppercase structure change the movement balance?

Uppercase letters often use larger directional changes and more separated stroke groups than lowercase letters. This episode holds the sample text and renderer conditions constant, then compares the same two writing models on the uppercase form of the pangram.

The purpose is not to declare one style universally fastest. It is to show how completion time, paper-trail motion, air travel, and total movement can point to different aspects of the same writing system.

Measured results

One uppercase run, seven metrics

Metric-specific results
Uppercase handwriting speed comparison results
MetricGetty Dubay Joined BeginningPlaywrite CAMetric result
Completion timeLower is faster for this run48.66 s53.55 sGetty Dubay Joined Beginning
Characters per minute35 uppercase letters; spaces excluded43.1539.21Getty Dubay Joined Beginning
Words per minuteNine-word uppercase test sentence11.110.1Getty Dubay Joined Beginning
Paper-trail lengthPen-down path length3,298 px4,074 pxGetty Dubay Joined Beginning
Air-travel lengthPen-up travel between strokes1,824 px1,119 pxPlaywrite CA
Total movementPaper trail + air travel5,122 px5,193 pxGetty Dubay Joined Beginning
Words completedSame task for both models99Tie

Each result identifies the better value for that metric in this run. It is not an overall ranking.

How the simulation works

Real uppercase stroke paths, rendered on canvas

The video was not generated by an AI image or video model. We extracted the actual stroke-order paths used by each tested writing model, then replayed those paths on canvas so the two uppercase trajectories could be compared under matched conditions.

The uppercase FAST setting uses 86.5 pixels per second in this renderer. Pen-up travel is modeled at 2.5 times the writing speed, so lifts are measured explicitly instead of disappearing from the comparison.

These are benchmark values from our renderer, not a universal physical measurement of every writer, pen, surface, or task.

What this run supports

Uppercase results also split by metric

Getty Dubay Joined Beginning completed this uppercase sample sooner, reached a higher measured character throughput, used a shorter paper trail, and ended with slightly less total movement. Playwrite CA used less air travel between strokes.

The uppercase run therefore reinforces the series principle: connection structure affects multiple movement costs at once. A lower pen-up distance does not automatically produce a shorter total path or faster completion time.

Transcript and limitations

Read the evidence without playing the video

Transcript: This controlled uppercase handwriting speed test compares Getty Dubay Joined Beginning with Playwrite CA. Both models write “THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG” at the same configured pen-tip speed. The test records completion time, characters per minute, words per minute, paper-trail length, air-travel length, total movement, and words completed. Getty finishes faster in this run, while Playwrite uses less air travel. The animation is an original deterministic canvas simulation from extracted real stroke paths, not AI-generated handwriting.

  • This page reports one controlled run, not a population study or a guarantee for every writer.
  • The pangram contains nine words and 35 uppercase letters; another sample may change the balance.
  • Pixel distances and speed settings describe this renderer’s benchmark model, not direct physical measurements of a human hand.
  • The experiment compares writing-model structure. It does not rank a font for legibility, learning outcomes, or personal preference.

Credits and independence

Original work published with permission

This independent comparison was created by Xin Wan / PrintableHandwriting with Kate Gladstone. Kate received permission from HandwritingSuccess to use the Getty Dubay model for font research, and PrintableHandwriting received Kate’s permission to publish this video, data, and explanatory page. PrintableHandwriting is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or a reseller for HandwritingSuccess.

Getty Dubay Joined Beginning is named here as a tested writing model. No competitor logo, product interface, purchase link, or endorsement is implied.